Cash For Clunkers Criticized

September 14, 2009

Prior to the establishment of the Cash for Clunkers there were a number voices that were critical of the program’s viability. The sentiment was that while the program sounded good on the surface but it wasn’t good overall for the national economy.

Even though the program is has now ended and yielded approximately 700,000 sales, the critics point out that Cash for Clunkers did stimulate economic growth but rather redistributed wealth and saddled gullible consumers will new debt loads they can’t manage.

Some opponents of the program suggest that Cash for Clunks will cause more harm to American consumers that good. According to these groups, the less fortunate among them may find themselves in worse financial shape as a result of jumping on the supposed deal.

But, is this gloom and doom at all accurate?

With all the supposed reports circulating around about the program’s debilitating effects on new car owners, you may be surprised by some of the following facts about the typical Cash for Clunkers deal. What’s clear is that there is a bit of exaggeration on the part of one group.

For instance, one the most common vehicles that qualified for a trade in was the 1998 Ford Explorer. If you had one of these and traded it in for a brand new Ford Focus, you could earn a credit worth $4,500, which would lower the MSRP on the Focus to about $11,500. With a down payment and some good negotiation for an additional discount, you could see about $10,000 in financing.

That’s for a four-year loan at approximately 7.5% interest. This would mean that your monthly payment would be below $250 a month. This is a far cry from the burdensome payments that have been suggested by the critics.

The bottom line is that the Cash for Clunkers program has been a legitimate help to the U.S. economy. It has given more people the opportunity to purchase affordable, lower-emission, and higher-MPG automobiles.

Related Entries

Comments

One Response to “Cash For Clunkers Criticized”

  1. Cars4Charities on September 15th, 2009 6:29 am

    Your article failed to mention the negative consequences of cash for clunkers. The biggest one was that 700,000 running vehicles were destroyed, many in good shape. Taking these vehicles out of the market had a tremendous negative impact on auto repair shops, parts stores, used car sales, car donation charities and low income citizens. This could easily have been avoided!

Got something to say?






HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.